露天矿爆破安全评估模型研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

河南省地质局地质灾害防治中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Research on Safety Assessment Model for Open-pit Mine Blasting
Author:
Affiliation:

The Prevention and Control Center for the Geological Disaster of Henan Geological Bureau

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对露天矿爆破安全定性评价量化计算困难的问题,为提高评估结果的准确性,提出建立了基于组合赋权及区间逼近的露天矿爆破安全评价模型。首先,结合爆破工程实际,选取了15个影响因素,构建了露天矿爆破安全评估指标体系;其次,根据组合赋权思想,将G1法和改进CRITIC法计算的主、客观权重耦合,获取均衡、合理的指标综合权重,然后,基于区间数理论,确定指标评估区间数,以避免传统定性评估点估计法数据不连续、指标信息易丢失扭曲的问题,,通过计算单指标偏离距离和综合偏离距离,综合判定爆破安全等级;最后,以湖南省5座露天矿爆破实例为研究对象,应用组合赋权-区间逼近法进行综合分析。结果显示表明,5座矿山爆破安全等级均为“较安全”等级,评估结果符合实际,验证了该模型在露天矿爆破安全评估方面的适用性。在后续研究过程中,还要不断丰富和完善评估体系,进一步提升模型的实用性。

    Abstract:

    In response to the difficulty in quantifying the qualitative evaluation of open-pit mine blasting safety, a open-pit mine blasting safety evaluation model based on combination weighting and interval approximation is proposed to improve the accuracy of the evaluation results. Firstly, based on the actual blasting engineering, 15 influencing factors were selected to construct a safety evaluation index system for open-pit mine blasting; Secondly, based on the idea of combinatorial weighting, the subjective and objective weights calculated by G1 method and improved CRITIC method are coupled to obtain balanced and reasonable comprehensive weights of indicators. Then, based on the interval number theory, the number of evaluation intervals for indicators is determined to avoid the problems of discontinuous data and easy loss and distortion of indicator information in traditional qualitative evaluation point estimation methods. By calculating the deviation distance of a single indicator and the comprehensive deviation distance, the blasting safety level is comprehensively judged; Finally, taking 5 open-pit mine blasting examples in Hunan Province as the research object, the combination weighting interval approximation method is applied for comprehensive analysis. The results showed that the blasting safety level of all 5 mines was "relatively safe", and the evaluation results were in line with reality, verifying the applicability of the model in the safety assessment of open-pit mine blasting.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-27
  • 最后修改日期:2025-07-18
  • 录用日期:2025-07-18
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码