分层废石胶结充填体的充填效果研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.华润电力锡林郭勒煤业有限公司;2.中煤科工集团武汉设计研究院有限公司

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学青年(42007279);中煤科工集团武汉设计研究院有限公司自主研发项目(ZZYF202238)


Study on the filling effect of layered waste rock cemented backfill.
Author:
Affiliation:

China Resources Power Xilingol Coal Industry Co,Xilihaote

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    废石胶结充填体在充填过程中常出现分层现象,可能影响充填效果,因此对分层充填体的充填效果进行研究具有重要意义。本研究首先对废石胶结充填体进行切片,分析了充填体不同分层的骨料分布特征。然后通过数值模拟,对比分析分层和不分层废石胶结充填体对采空区充填效果的影响。研究发现:(1)不分层充填体在顶板支护效果、顶板沉降、侧帮受力和内部稳定性等方面表现更优秀,能提供更稳定的支护效果,减小顶板沉降,降低侧帮受力,保障矿山作业安全。(2)不分层充填体在顶板中部应力略高于分层充填体,但在顶板两侧的应力分布上更均匀,提供更稳定的顶板支护;顶板沉降程度明显更小,支护效果优于分层充填体;侧帮受力均匀,位移较小,相比之下分层充填体的侧帮受力较大,位移不均匀。(3)分层充填体上层细骨料分布较多使其易受压力变形,而不分层充填体内部废石分布均匀,整体承载能力更强,形变相对较小。综上所述,不分层废石胶结充填体在采空区支护效果和稳定性方面表现更出色,因此在进行充填体配比时要尽量控制充填体的分层现象,为矿山运营提供重要保障。

    Abstract:

    In the filling process, layered phenomena often occur in cemented waste rock backfill, which may affect the filling effect. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the filling effect of layered backfill. In this study, the cemented waste rock backfill was sliced to analyze the aggregate distribution characteristics of different layers in the backfill. Subsequently, through numerical simulation, the influence of layered and non-layered cemented waste rock backfill on the filling effect of goaf was compared and analyzed. The study found that: (1) Non-layered backfill performs better in terms of roof support, roof subsidence, side wall stress, and internal stability, providing a more stable support effect, reducing roof subsidence, lowering side wall stress, and ensuring the safety of mining operations. (2) The stress in the middle of the roof of non-layered backfill is slightly higher than that of layered backfill, but the stress distribution on both sides of the roof is more uniform, providing a more stable roof support; the degree of roof subsidence is significantly smaller, and the support effect is better than that of layered backfill; the side wall stress is uniform with small displacement, whereas the side wall stress of layered backfill is greater with uneven displacement. (3) The presence of more fine aggregates in the upper layer of layered backfill makes it more susceptible to pressure deformation, while the uniform distribution of waste rocks in non-layered backfill provides a stronger overall load-bearing capacity with relatively small deformation. In conclusion, non-layered cemented waste rock backfill demonstrates superior support and stability in goaf, therefore, efforts should be made to control the layered phenomena in backfill composition, providing crucial support for mining operations.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-28
  • 最后修改日期:2024-06-27
  • 录用日期:2024-06-28
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: