厚硬顶板直覆型沿空巷道冲击失稳机理及防治研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东科技大学 能源与矿业工程学院;2.兖矿能源集团股份有限公司 东滩煤矿

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TD353???????

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(52374098);山东省优秀青年科学基金项目(ZR202211070181);深部煤矿采动响应与灾害防控国家重点实验室开放基金资助项目(SKLMRDPC20KF05);山东省高等学校青创团队计划资助项目(2022KJ212)


Research on the Impact Instability Mechanism and Prevention of Gob-Side Entry Retaining with Direct-Covering Thick and Hard Roof
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于厚硬顶板直覆型沿空巷道冲击失稳问题,以山东某矿63上06工作面沿空巷道为工程背景,采用现场实测、理论分析、数值模拟相结合的研究方法,分析直覆型顶板破断特征、释能机制及沿空巷道冲击失稳能量判别准则,阐明厚硬顶板直覆型沿空巷道冲击失稳机理。研究结果表明:厚硬顶板直覆采场“板-壳”覆岩结构失稳演化具有周期长、覆岩运移控制范围广及顶板破断动载突出的特征,相比一般巷道,厚硬顶板直覆型巷道受动载扰动影响更加突出;受直覆型厚硬顶板大范围悬顶影响,“板-壳”覆岩结构运动将会增加沿空巷道超前静载,同时会向下传递剧烈动载,两者共同作用使直覆型厚硬顶板破断产生超强动载,从而引起巷道发生冲击失稳;现场实例表明,直覆型厚硬顶板初次破断尺寸为58m,破断释放能量3.5×1107 J,传递至巷道的能量为8.9×105 J,周期破断尺寸为28m,释放能量为1.7×107 J,传递至巷道的能量为4.36×105 J,小于63上06沿空巷道临 界冲击能量1.25×106 J,表明常规条件下直覆型厚硬顶板初次破断或周期破断不会诱发巷道冲击失移;提出了“工作面匀速或低速开采+直覆厚硬顶板深孔爆破预裂+强化超前支护”的综合防控对策,并在煤矿现场进行了工业性试验。研究成果可对类似工程地质条件下厚硬顶板直覆型沿空巷道冲击失稳防控提供一定参考。

    Abstract:

    Based on the problem of impact instability of gob-side entry retaining with direct-covering thick and hard roof, taking the gob-side entry retaining of 63upper 06 working face of a mine in Shandong Province as the engineering background, the research methods of field measurement, theoretical analysis and numerical simulation were used to analyze the breaking characteristics and energy release mechanism of direct-covering thick and hard roof and energy criterion of impact instability of gob-side entry retaining. Then, the mechanism of impact instability of gob-side entry retaining with direct-covering thick and hard roof was clarified. The results show that the instability evolution of the “plate-shell” overburden structure in the stope with direct-covering thick and hard roof has the characteristics of long period, wide range of overlying strata migration control and prominent dynamic load of roof breaking. Compared with the general roadway, this kind of gob-side entry retaining is more affected by dynamic load disturbance. Affected by the large-scale hanging strata of the direct-covering thick and hard roof, the movement of the “plate-shell” overburden structure will increase the advanced static load of the gob-side entry retaining, at the same time, it will transmit severe dynamic load downward. The combined action of the static load and dynamic load causes the direct-covering thick and hard roof to break and produce super-strong dynamic load, which causes the impact instability of the gob-side entry retaining. The field case shows that the initial fracture size of the direct-covering thick and hard roof is 58m,the fracture release energy is 3.5×107 J, and the energy transmitted to the gob-side entry retaining is 8.9×105 J; the periodic fracture size is 28m, there lease energy is 1.7×107 J, and the energy transmitted to the gob-side entry retaining is 4.36×105 J, which is less than the critical impact energy 1.25×106 J of the 63upper 06 gob-side entry retaining, indicating that the initial fracture or periodic fracture of the direct-covering thick and hard roof will not induce the impact displacement of gob-side entry retaining under conventional conditions. The comprehensive prevention and control measures of “uniform or low speed mining of working face+ deep hole blasting pre-splitting of direct-covering thick and hard roof+ strengthening advanced support” were put forward, and industrial tests were carried out on the coal mine site. The research results can provide some reference for the prevention and control of impact instability of gob-side entry retaining with direct-covering thick and hard roof under similar engineering geological conditions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-16
  • 最后修改日期:2024-02-06
  • 录用日期:2024-02-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-03-21
  • 出版日期: